From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 20 12:20:43 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5DBE106566B for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2012 12:20:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from break19@gmail.com) Received: from mail-gy0-f182.google.com (mail-gy0-f182.google.com [209.85.160.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BCDE8FC0A for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2012 12:20:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ghrr20 with SMTP id r20so7449792ghr.13 for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2012 05:20:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=o7wErjY2wNLSAa7XBZOr/KZn2qxA6F+gPHlMDJ3zCss=; b=kps+TMFInKVe+J8g/Da6QKEAx1ty+dPTxiinYSZS9bXKIhs9lyxOu31bDu7FR2uxCB uTNMEOQF+a1m8Ri5avXVKyrnwsW/mdMQBpFFgLcjFCbgzZMFQuXUYbIjuk0nD+fC/H/3 jAueTohiQp2mISckrnBePkrfsjspeiLTdowlZn7uBG5EJ8KKzqfCam7ykX/vWtN3TolV 7QNViR/cI4tuI9G4Fd1KCBdFIbiIvQnf/L7iTdHJjrk75E9ZpH+YQqXCyLVvlfwAC364 wa59Dcvssf0BnNs5f23nH3wT9tWAyVqSf3VG+iXRvx7Fz1czGv4gX+OLpbYglsFmoZms Cq4g== Received: by 10.236.156.34 with SMTP id l22mr15893744yhk.118.1332246037109; Tue, 20 Mar 2012 05:20:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.4.103] (c-71-229-1-99.hsd1.al.comcast.net. [71.229.1.99]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 2sm1552300ane.12.2012.03.20.05.20.36 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 20 Mar 2012 05:20:36 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4F687624.9090604@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 07:20:52 -0500 From: Chuck Burns User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org References: <20120319213508.GA1692@azathoth.lan> <20120320091935.GF1692@azathoth.lan> <20120320102008.GH2358@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: ABI/architecture identification for packages X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 12:20:43 -0000 We should probably pad the version number, and shorten things up.. similar to: package-1.2-fbsd09.1-x86.pkg package-1.2-fbsd09.1-x64.pkg package-1.2-fbsd09.1-ppc.pkg package-1.2-fbsd09.1-ppc64.pkg package-1.2-fbsd09.1-arm.pkg For app "Package" version 1.2, on FreeBSD 9.1 drop the .1 for .0 versions. The reason for the padding is to help with sorting, at least until freebsd 100.0 comes out. :P Chuck Burns On 3/20/2012 5:40 AM, Alexander Yerenkow wrote: > IMHO, > 32 / 64 = easily parsable and represent integer. > > i386/amd64 - wellknown names, but this info about processor bits not lies > in math. > My point is i386 is arch, so can be kept, while 32 is processor bit count. > If you'll keep 32/64 various checks in side software will be simple (if you > have 32 bit processor, then this info is bundled in "32"), > while if you consider using "i386" string as storage of information about > "32" bit, it not so elegant. > Also, linuxes has come to i386- i586- i686- mess, and many their scripts > looks overbloated when they checks if system really 32 bit. > > Just my point of view :) > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"