From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 06:33:10 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C71F16A4CF for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 06:33:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from tiny.bsdlibre.net (tiny.bsdlibre.net [80.65.226.240]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3A8543D2F for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 06:33:05 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from regis@bsdlibre.net) Received: from localhost (localhost.bsdlibre.net [127.0.0.1]) by tiny.bsdlibre.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85698650D; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 15:33:04 +0100 (CET) Received: from tiny.bsdlibre.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tiny.bsdlibre.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 86059-08; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 15:33:03 +0100 (CET) Received: by tiny.bsdlibre.net (Postfix, from userid 80) id 1C772650C; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 15:33:03 +0100 (CET) Received: from luxproxye.europarl.eu.int (luxproxye.europarl.eu.int [212.190.74.31]) by mail.bsdlibre.net (IMP) with HTTP for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 15:33:02 +0100 Message-ID: <1074090782.4005531ee7950@mail.bsdlibre.net> Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 15:33:02 +0100 From: Regis GRAF To: sos@deepcore.dk References: <200401141423.i0EENabD020528@spider.deepcore.dk> In-Reply-To: <200401141423.i0EENabD020528@spider.deepcore.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.2 / FreeBSD-5.1 X-Originating-IP: 212.190.74.31 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at bsdlibre.net cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ata problem with 5.2-RELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 14:33:10 -0000 Selon sos@deepcore.dk: > It seems Régis GRAF wrote: > > > > Hi, > > I just up my 5.1p11 to 5.2-RELEASE, and have a lot of such messages : > > > > Jan 13 20:45:35 tiny kernel: ad0: FAILURE - WRITE_DMA > status=51 > > error=84 LBA=79763263 > > Did 5.1p11 issue any messages that you didn't have an 80pin cable ? > The logic for that has changed to use what the controller see's, which > might be borked on some HW. > Anyhow the error is because your cable doesn't support the ATA133 speed > and produces bit errors... > > -Sřren > The 5.1p11 never issue a message concerning problem with cable or write error. I never had read error. The controler is an add-on card on this machine. The cable does normally support ata133 (I'll verify this tonight) and the whome worked perfectly (with UDMA133) on 5.1p11. Régis ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.