Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 22:12:20 +0930 From: "Daniel O'Connor" <doconnor@gsoft.com.au> To: Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Blocked process Message-ID: <200908202212.22831.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> In-Reply-To: <20090820114807.GQ9623@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> References: <200908201204.24914.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> <BEA3E817-E2BB-4D09-A97A-1556FF846599@gid.co.uk> <20090820114807.GQ9623@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--nextPart1417129.K1UdWuLWqV Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Thu, 20 Aug 2009, Kostik Belousov wrote: > > Things like ls on the console might take several seconds to respond > > when the box didn't seem to be very busy (but wasn't idle, maybe > > serving a little NFS). It wasn't the shell getting swapped out or > > anything else obvious. This was on SMP, not using X. The problem > > went away with 6.4R (had to stay with 6.x for unrelated reasons). > > 6.1 was released with a bug in NFS server, causing serious slowdown > when non-MPSAFE fs was exported. Hmmm.. this is 6.2 (and a half) so I guess that's not my problem. Next! ;) =2D-=20 Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C --nextPart1417129.K1UdWuLWqV Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.12 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBKjUSu5ZPcIHs/zowRAmZyAJ9qcGfukK916aZogpZdKtO8o6KUuQCgmuGD uxoErC5nkshHVCRc8GGWzPo= =MAJ8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1417129.K1UdWuLWqV--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200908202212.22831.doconnor>