From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Sep 5 13:20:14 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from lexicon.ins.com (ns1.ins.com [199.0.193.15]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F2411510F for ; Sun, 5 Sep 1999 13:20:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from pepin_j@ins.com) Received: from pepinj (exodus.ins.com [199.0.193.215]) by lexicon.ins.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id NAA18942; Sun, 5 Sep 1999 13:19:52 -0700 (PDT) Reply-To: From: "Joe Pepin" To: "Kevin Day" , "FBSDQuestion" Subject: RE: PCI modems do not work??? Date: Sun, 5 Sep 1999 16:09:23 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-reply-to: <199909051942.OAA42708@celery.dragondata.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 Importance: Normal Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I've got a nice Rockwell(A-Open) PCI non-winmodem, dual-standard all the bells and whistles. I'd love it if it worked under FreeBSD. I can't be the only person with these things. I wouldn't know even where to look in the source though :( If I can do some testing or whatever though, let me know. Sincerely, Joe Pepin -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG]On Behalf Of Kevin Day Sent: Sunday, September 05, 1999 8:42 PM To: Chuck Robey Cc: Kevin Day; Ugen Antsilevitch; questions@FreeBSD.ORG; hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: PCI modems do not work??? > > On Sun, 5 Sep 1999, Kevin Day wrote: > > > > > > > Well.. i just looked through some archives and also on the > > > recent traffic in freebsd-questions. > > > It seems there are great many people that have same problem i do - apparently > > > our beloved system does not support PCI modems? Now if i am wrong here - > > > kick me and ignore the rest of the message. > > > If i am right - this really has to be fixed and soon. There aren't many ISA > > > 56K modems out there that aren't winmodems. On my last search everything that > > > was 56K was divided about 80% winmodems and 20% PCI modems (with UART). > > > I don't think for someone with understanding of low level drivers implementing > > > this should be too hard? After all all the difference AFAIK is in how interrupts > > > are delivered from a device. It still has the same ports, doesn't it? > > > > I'm actually going to look at doing this tommorow, but I have to admit the > > sio driver isn't really going to like doing this. Has anyone looked at this > > before and could possibly give any suggestions as to how I should begin > > this? > > Are you aware that the least part of making this work is the PCI > interface question? What's needed is the entire AT command set, and > sometimes all the dsp processing too. What's left on those PCI modems > isn't as smart as my wind up alarm clock. The only reason interfacing > isn't a Windows nightmare is because of the Bios that all the Winmodems > have (there isn't any standard for this strange interface). > No, I'm working on adding support for PCI based non-winmodems. Modems that still have a 16550 based uart interface to them, but just happen to sit on the PCI bus. I'm not at all planning on writing support for winmodems, just making sio.c understand UARTs on the PCI bus. There *are* PCI modems out there that aren't winmodems, they're just hard to find. 3Com makes one, as well as a few other companies. Kevin To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message