Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2017 15:50:47 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 214864] [exp-run] test build with lld as /usr/bin/ld Message-ID: <bug-214864-13-rpZMuMbPD8@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-214864-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-214864-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D214864 --- Comment #27 from Ed Maste <emaste@freebsd.org> --- (In reply to Antoine Brodin from comment #24) Is there a straightforward way to find the ports directly skipped as a resu= lt of libunwind failure, rather than all ~8K that include transitive skipped ports? Interestingly, libunwind does not build on arm64 and there it's list= ed as being responsible for 11 skipped ports. I've updated bapt's original LLD_UNSAFE patch, now in https://reviews.freebsd.org/D12064 and can build devel/libunwind with that applied (when /usr/bin/ld is ld.lld). I'll attach it as a patch as well. Perhaps we can do another exp-run with both patches applied? i386 should al= so largely work now with the current hack to forcibly link (only) libc with ld.bfd. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-214864-13-rpZMuMbPD8>