Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 17:42:05 EST From: Freebsd0101@aol.com To: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Mrs. Butterworth vs Vermont Maid Message-ID: <64.4cd47ed2.2f1eeabd@aol.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In a message dated 1/18/05 4:41:12 PM Eastern Standard Time, thad.butterworth@hp.com writes: >Gary, >Maybe if you offered solutions instead of whining and bashing all the >time people would be interested in what you have to say. All we've ever >seen you do is throw out insults and complain. If FreeBSD is so bad, use >another OS. >I'm sure Microsoft would be more than happy to have you shell out the >money for their products, and you'd get the sort of support you want >-er, well, sort of. That's all I'm going to say on the matter. > > >Thad -------- And this coming from a guy who thinks he's so smart that hes spamming some poor tax attorney who likely never has heard of FreeBSD? What a turd you are Mrs. Butterworth. But I find your confidence in your stupidity quite entertaining! Actually, Thad, I've stated my case, and got the president of the FreeBSD foundation to publically admit that I'm right about 5.x performance. I've only "insulted" people who insulted me or my claims first. I'm sure that a lot of people considering 5.x won't waste their time with it now, which is much more of a "service" than you have ever provided. What you list jockeys don't "get" is that just because you don't care about an issue doesn't mean that its not an important issue to a lot of other people; people who don't spend their time flaming people about issues they don't know the first thing about just for the sake of doing it. And from where do you "get" that I think FreeBSD is bad? FreeBSD 4.x is great. I just wish they'd support it instead of calling 5.x a production release before its even close to 4.x performance standards.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?64.4cd47ed2.2f1eeabd>