Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 12:41:05 -0400 From: Adam Weinberger <adamw@FreeBSD.org> To: Bryan Drewery <bdrewery@freebsd.org> Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, andrej.zverev@gmail.com, Andrej Zverev <az@freebsd.org>, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r347936 - in head: . japanese japanese/p5-Mail-SpamAssassin japanese/spamassassin mail mail/claws-mail-spamassassin mail/evolution mail/exim mail/isbg mail/mailscanner mail/mimedefang m... Message-ID: <3596f58636da4fea6a3ef18f37f3a1f4@apnoea.adamw.org> In-Reply-To: <9333504ab697be6785edb24b4d3cf700@shatow.net> References: <201403112149.s2BLneVw006063@svn.freebsd.org> <CAD5bB%2BjEvGMvX8zGVfO=ymU-fgBt-7hCgp3PixMPUaHv3KZEFw@mail.gmail.com> <5320570D.5060709@FreeBSD.org> <CAD5bB%2BhcQP=K-wYkPGocvrZHQjsemstYtxgFeR1P7fWFj-ZOCA@mail.gmail.com> <9333504ab697be6785edb24b4d3cf700@shatow.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2014/03/12 12:17, Bryan Drewery wrote: > I don't understand what you are saying here. I was suggesting a > p5-Mail-Spamassassin with the libraries and a spamassassin with the > frontend. This does not require modifying anything upstream. It is > just a slave port, or sub-package once we have support for that. The > same is done in many other ports. Your logic is sound here. In this case, however, "spamassassin the binaries" is really not separable from "spamassassin the Perl modules," as the binaries are simply wrappers for the Perl modules. # Adam --- Adam Weinberger adamw@adamw.org http://www.adamw.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3596f58636da4fea6a3ef18f37f3a1f4>