From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 16 16:14:43 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75ADC106566B; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 16:14:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mel.flynn+fbsd.current@mailing.thruhere.net) Received: from mailhub.rachie.is-a-geek.net (rachie.is-a-geek.net [66.230.99.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D1A68FC0A; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 16:14:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mel.flynn+fbsd.current@mailing.thruhere.net) Received: from smoochies.rachie.is-a-geek.net (mailhub.rachie.is-a-geek.net [192.168.2.11]) by mailhub.rachie.is-a-geek.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 293887E818; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 08:14:42 -0800 (AKDT) From: Mel Flynn To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 08:14:39 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.11.4 (FreeBSD/8.0-BETA1; KDE/4.2.4; i386; ; ) References: <200907122306.04887.mel.flynn+fbsd.current@mailing.thruhere.net> <3a142e750907130015k2a607dd3w6f1f3c8e0885c547@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <3a142e750907130015k2a607dd3w6f1f3c8e0885c547@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200907160814.41048.mel.flynn+fbsd.current@mailing.thruhere.net> Cc: "Robert N. M. Watson" Subject: Re: odd make/build output on ^Z / fg X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 16:14:43 -0000 On Sunday 12 July 2009 23:15:19 Paul B. Mahol wrote: > On 7/13/09, Mel Flynn wrote: > > On Sunday 12 July 2009 15:52:46 Paul B. Mahol wrote: > >> On 7/12/09, Robert N. M. Watson wrote: > >> > On 12 Jul 2009, at 19:16, Mel Flynn wrote: > >> >> On Wednesday 08 July 2009 23:37:36 Robert Watson wrote: > >> >>> *** Signal 1 > >> >>> couldn't resume audit_arg.o: No such process > >> >>> *** Signal 1 > >> >>> couldn't resume nlm_prot_impl.o: No such process > >> >>> *** Signal 1 > >> >>> couldn't resume nfs_serv.o: No such process > >> >>> *** Signal 1 > >> >>> couldn't resume nfs_vnops.o: No such process > >> >>> *** Signal 1 > >> >>> couldn't resume modules-obj: No such process > >> >>> ===> usb/uether (obj) > >> >>> ===> usb/aue (obj) > >> >>> ... > >> >>> ===> xfs (obj) > >> >>> ===> xl (obj) > >> >>> ===> zfs (obj) > >> >>> ===> zlib (obj) > >> >>> *** Signal 1 > >> >>> 6 errors > >> >>> > >> >>> I've never seen that before, but I also don't suspend builds all > >> >>> that frequently. New bug? Old bug? > >> >> > >> >> Also seen this with a suspended port build, but didn't investigate > >> >> further, > >> >> just restarted the build. Shell used is zsh, in case that matters. I > >> >> am not > >> >> sure if I was building in parallel. Currently running r195188M: Tue > >> >> Jun 30 > >> >> 12:16:01 AKDT 2009. I remember I had that build suspended for a few > >> >> hours, but > >> >> not a chance I ran out of swap (which would kill processes without > >> >> my direct > >> >> knowledge). > >> > > >> > I'm using tcsh here. > >> > >> I got same with some ports few weeks ago, disabling multiple jobs fixed > >> it almost always. > >> > >> Will try to reproduce with kernel next time ... > > > > Is it possible you guys let it suspend over 24 hours? It's possible I did > > Negative, ports I tried complained during ^Z almost immediately. Just did this too on a 7.1-STABLE box from Feb 8. Indeed a parallel build and I wonder if we all use ccache? -- Mel