From owner-freebsd-questions Wed Sep 25 18:31:30 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B8F137B401 for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2002 18:31:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sccrmhc03.attbi.com (sccrmhc03.attbi.com [204.127.202.63]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB3B043E3B for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2002 18:31:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from swear@attbi.com) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([12.242.158.67]) by sccrmhc03.attbi.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.27 201-229-121-127-20010626) with ESMTP id <20020926013128.WIPW28420.sccrmhc03.attbi.com@localhost.localdomain>; Thu, 26 Sep 2002 01:31:28 +0000 Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.localdomain (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g8Q1Xs3q006044; Wed, 25 Sep 2002 18:33:54 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from swear@attbi.com) Received: (from jojo@localhost) by localhost.localdomain (8.12.5/8.12.5/Submit) id g8Q1Xh6I006041; Wed, 25 Sep 2002 18:33:43 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from swear@attbi.com) X-Authentication-Warning: localhost.localdomain: jojo set sender to swear@attbi.com using -f To: Peter Leftwich Cc: FreeBSD-Questions@FreeBSD.Org Subject: Re: how to find executable files References: <20020925192519.W17635-100000@earl-grey.cloud9.net> From: swear@attbi.com (Gary W. Swearingen) Date: 25 Sep 2002 18:33:43 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20020925192519.W17635-100000@earl-grey.cloud9.net> Message-ID: Lines: 23 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.1 (Cuyahoga Valley) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Peter Leftwich writes: > Erg, I knew that! :-/ It's just that I view the whole "u+x" scheme as > "the easy way" and that real Unix junkies roll up their sleeves and use > numeric perm's such as 0777 and 644 :-) Assuming that you're also referring to the scheme's use in "chmod", note that it can do things the numeric scheme can't do, such as going thru a dir tree copying the "user" write bit to the "other" write bit. > That is, it wouldn't kill the author to mention some keyword or buzzword > such as "recurse" or "subdirectories..." Am I alone on this? Well, I think most people try not to bother others with such doc problems outside of the Problem Report mechanism, where they won't be immediately forgotten and have some hope of being of benefit to FreeBSD. If you don't file a PR, the problem is unlikely to get fixed, leaving the problem for more people to encounter. And often, with docs, the person who thinks there is a problem is in the best position to propose a fix. Of course, if your fix proposal leaves hard work for others to do, it's also unlikely to be fixed, so you have to use judgement, but there are some people, like Giorgos, who spend some of their time on such work to improve FreeBSD. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message