Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2001 14:38:44 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" <dev-null@NUXI.com> To: Peter Pentchev <roam@ringlet.net> Cc: arch@FreeBSD.org, ports@FreeBSD.org, Alexander Langer <alex@big.endian.de> Subject: Re: ports.conf Message-ID: <20010823143844.A18197@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <20010824001737.B1714@ringworld.oblivion.bg>; from roam@ringlet.net on Fri, Aug 24, 2001 at 12:17:37AM %2B0300 References: <20010823210729.A95484@zerogravity.kawo2.rwth-aachen.d> <20010823135941.B4003@dragon.nuxi.com> <20010824001737.B1714@ringworld.oblivion.bg>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Aug 24, 2001 at 12:17:37AM +0300, Peter Pentchev wrote: > I think he meant 'maintained in the ports/ tree' just as make.conf > is 'maintained in the src/ tree', that is, there is a src/etc/make.conf > file with evolving defaults. Yes, ports.conf should probably live > in /etc or some such place, but I, too, think that it should be > maintained in the ports tree, quite possibly in ports/Mk/. How are you suggesting ports.conf get into /etc? A `make world' cannot depend on having a populated /usr/ports/Mk. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010823143844.A18197>