Date: Sat, 09 Dec 2000 16:47:07 -0800 From: Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@cup.hp.com> To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> Cc: obrien@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: linprocfs placement... Message-ID: <3A32D28B.C4F61AD1@cup.hp.com> References: <200012091325.eB9DPsN51281@freefall.freebsd.org> <20001209105657.B23013@dragon.nuxi.com> <xzplmtps5m9.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <20001209123033.A24013@dragon.nuxi.com> <xzpu28dqo9x.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <3A32A704.F5AFD02B@cup.hp.com> <xzpg0jxqma8.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > > Linprocfs is totally independent of the linuxulator, and doesn't need > it to run. Ah, ok. I thought it needed the Linuxulator. > Ideally, once it becomes machine-independent (or at least > runs on more platforms than just i386), it should move to > /sys/compat/linprocfs. I'd rather *not* see it integrated into the > linuxulator, as that would make it a *lot* more difficult for me to > maintain (I'd have to kill any Linux binaries I have running every > time I want to test a change) I see your point. In that case I prefer it if linprocfs is moved from under the linux subdirectory to a place of it's own. It now has no business their at all. Where linprocfs should be moved to is not exactly clear. It started off in sys/miscfs and moved to sys/i386/linux. Moving it again to, say, sys/i386 might not make everybody happy. All this moving gets you thinking that we're simply not doing it right... I really think we should integrate... I guess we don't get anywhere this way, so I'll shut up... :-/ -- Marcel Moolenaar mail: marcel@cup.hp.com / marcel@FreeBSD.org tel: (408) 447-4222 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3A32D28B.C4F61AD1>