From owner-freebsd-chat Tue Aug 15 15:58: 0 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from mail.enteract.com (mail.enteract.com [207.229.143.33]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48B9937BC93 for ; Tue, 15 Aug 2000 15:57:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dscheidt@enteract.com) Received: from shell-1.enteract.com (dscheidt@shell-1.enteract.com [207.229.143.40]) by mail.enteract.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id RAA88920; Tue, 15 Aug 2000 17:57:42 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dscheidt@enteract.com) Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2000 17:57:41 -0500 (CDT) From: David Scheidt To: Terry Lambert Cc: fran@reyes.somos.net, "Nicole Harrington." , "(Mike Tancsa)" , "chat@FreeBSD.ORG" Subject: Re: 3ware IDE Raid. SCSI killer? In-Reply-To: <200008152136.OAA21153@usr02.primenet.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org (cc's snipped.) On Tue, 15 Aug 2000, Terry Lambert wrote: :> On Sat, 12 Aug 2000 00:09:34 +0000 (GMT), Terry Lambert wrote: :> >...as a backhand reference to the fact that IDE dtill does not :> >support concurrent outstanding I/O via tagged command queueing. :> :> I could be wrong, but I though I read some reference to tagged :> queing on the 3ware site. : :The standard supports it. No one implements it in any drives. : I've been led to believe this is because if they did, the disks would cost almost as much as SCSI disks. The only thing IDE has going for it is that it's cheap. David To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message