Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 00:23:11 -0700 From: "Kurt Buff" <kurt.buff@gmail.com> To: "Matthew Seaman" <m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk> Cc: Nikola Lecic <nlecic@eunet.yu>, Questions User <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Quick perl ports question Message-ID: <a9f4a3860708300023p11d84635mf7cd6056fe086edd@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <46D65AA5.8070403@infracaninophile.co.uk> References: <a9f4a3860708291622y70b31b2nc18e426785d9419@mail.gmail.com> <200708300336.l7U3aF10017242@eunet.yu> <46D65AA5.8070403@infracaninophile.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 8/29/07, Matthew Seaman <m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk> wrote: > Nikola Lecic wrote: > > > C) port it! > > > > is the best. :) Seriously, if you really have a long term need for > > Net::LDAP module, then porting would be the most convenient for you and > > for others. > > It's already been done. I don't know why the port is called > p5-perl-ldap instead of p5-Net-LDAP though. Possibly it pre-dates > the current naming conventions. > > Cheers, > > Matthew Ah, thanks so very much. It's option D) - the comfy chair! :) Kurt
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?a9f4a3860708300023p11d84635mf7cd6056fe086edd>