Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2000 18:16:56 -0400 (EDT) From: Brett Taylor <brett@peloton.runet.edu> To: Leif Neland <leif@neland.dk> Cc: Szilveszter Adam <sziszi@petra.hos.u-szeged.hu>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Ports won't build on stable Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0010131815110.719-100000@peloton.runet.edu> In-Reply-To: <00cf01c03559$0f589940$0e00a8c0@neland.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, On Fri, 13 Oct 2000, Leif Neland wrote: > A: Could the ports tarball be created from a cvsup'ped tree with > whatever information is needed for cvs to recognize it as its own > child? I guess it could. > B: Shouldn't the need to erase a tarballed tree be mentioned in the > UPDATING? You don't need to erase the whole tree, just an pkg/ or patches/ directories that don't get removed. > C: Do you really mean it won't _touch_ what it hasn't created, or it > just won't remove what it hasn't created? Sorry - it won't remove it is correct. Standard disclaimer - this is what I remember only and may be worth only the electrons used to put this on your screen. :-) Brett ***************************************************** Dr. Brett Taylor brett@peloton.runet.edu * Dept of Chem and Physics * Curie 39A (540) 831-6147 * ***************************************************** To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0010131815110.719-100000>