Date: Sat, 06 Aug 2005 00:28:01 -0700 From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@haven.freebsd.dk> Cc: arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: putting HESIOD, Appletalk and IPX on notice Message-ID: <42F46681.10708@elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <21744.1123267707@phk.freebsd.dk> References: <21744.1123267707@phk.freebsd.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > I think it is time we deorbit HESIOD in toto. > > At the same time, making Appletalk and IPX "opt in" facilities by > putting them under > YES_IPX > and > YES_APPLETALK how does this differ from options NETATALK and options NETIPX? Or do you mean for the complete build, i.e netstat etc. as well? My comment on both is that they do live as good working examples of other "foreign" network stacks.I also know that there are quite a few old MACS sitting around doing various pronter management functions etc. I don't know whether they will be gone by 2007 though. > boolean build options seems a sensible move. > > Comments ? > > The first RELENG_7 release would happen in 2006 or 2007, there is no way > they will need any of those three protocols. >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?42F46681.10708>