Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2001 15:33:39 -0500 From: csg@waterspout.com (C. Stephen Gunn) To: Alex Pilosov <alex@pilosoft.com> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, wes@softweyr.com Subject: Re: Problems with VLAN and natd. Message-ID: <200101032028.PAA71628@tsunami.waterspout.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 03 Jan 2001 12:26:21 EST." <Pine.BSO.4.10.10101031218370.25327-100000@spider.pilosoft.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 03 Jan 2001 12:26:21 EST, Alex Pilosov wrote: > Sometimes in the course of human events it is necessary to break with > compatibility ;) I believe netgraph is sufficiently advanced and well-made > system that it should be used as much as possible. Microsoft might argue the same about Windows. Someone has to take the counterpoint around here. ;-) > There's nothing that would prevent OpenBSD people from taking > netgraph and implementing it. I run OpenBSD, and threw the idea a > few times on their mailing lists, and response was less than > enthusiastic...Which lead me to choose FreeBSD for my next networking > project. :) We can't _make_ the Linux folks adopt BSD technologies either, but we continue to jump through hoops for compatability layers in the BSD variants. I'm just advocating a search for prior-art, and/or a friendly design conversation with the other projects _before_ integration into FreeBSD. - Steve -- C. Stephen Gunn <csg@waterspout.com> | Waterspout Communications, Inc. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200101032028.PAA71628>