From owner-freebsd-current Fri Jan 7 4:38:57 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from blackdawn.com (deepspace9.dcds.edu [207.231.151.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 981A215611 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2000 04:38:54 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from will@blackdawn.com) Received: (from will@localhost) by blackdawn.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id HAA00479; Fri, 7 Jan 2000 07:38:16 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from will) Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.4.0 on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <5683.947203693@zippy.cdrom.com> Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2000 07:38:12 -0500 (EST) From: will andrews To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Subject: Re: 4.0 code freeze scheduled for Jan 15th Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG, Peter Jeremy , mjacob@feral.com Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 07-Jan-00 Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > It's a feature freeze, sorry. I still expect the loose-ends that are > in place as of that date to be tied up afterwards. Doesn't this statement make the entire thread about IPv6 + PC-Card support entirely moot? Feature freezes don't mean we can't improve those two areas, right? Right? :-) If so, the entire thread could die right about now and I'd be happy. :) -- Will Andrews GCS/E/S @d- s+:+>+:- a--->+++ C++ UB++++ P+ L- E--- W+++ !N !o ?K w--- ?O M+ V-- PS+ PE++ Y+ PGP+>+++ t++ 5 X++ R+ tv+ b++>++++ DI+++ D+ G++>+++ e->++++ h! r-->+++ y? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message