From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 20 07:22:19 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C150016A4CE; Tue, 20 Jul 2004 07:22:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from access-sys-eu.com (mail.access-sys-eu.com [62.217.63.76]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9E6643D5A; Tue, 20 Jul 2004 07:22:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from faxeggink@gmx.de) Received: from [192.168.9.202] [62.177.251.197] by access-sys-eu.com with ESMTP (SMTPD32-8.04) id A99286D021E; Tue, 20 Jul 2004 09:28:18 +0200 Message-ID: <40FCC6C6.3010807@gmx.de> Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2004 09:16:22 +0200 From: Joerg Eggink User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.1 (Windows/20040626) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kris Kennaway References: <40FCC4E4.90504@gmx.de> <20040720071728.GA81303@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20040720071728.GA81303@xor.obsecurity.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: ports@FreeBSD.org cc: billf@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: ethereal-0.10.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2004 07:22:19 -0000 Dear Kris Thanks for your answer. Unfortunately I have no experience how to do such a task. So I will wait. Best Regards Joerg Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Tue, Jul 20, 2004 at 09:08:20AM +0200, Joerg Eggink wrote: > >>Hello >> >>I'm using freebsd 4.9 and when I try to install ethereal I always get >>the following error. >> >>------------------------------------ >>===> ethereal-0.10.3 has known vulnerabilities: >> >>>>multiple vulnerabilities in ethereal. >> >> Reference: >> >> >>>>multiple vulnerabilities in ethereal. >> >> Reference: >> >> >>>>Please update your ports tree and try again. >> >>*** Error code 1 >> >>Stop in /usr/ports/net/ethereal. >>----------------------------------- >> >>Is there a plan to update ethereal port soon ? > > > I asked billf last week about this, but it looks like it still has not > been updated. If some other committer can step in to help, the > various PRs assigned about this problem are well and truly in the > "Maintainer timeout" category by now. > > Kris