From owner-freebsd-current Fri Sep 4 07:07:50 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id HAA26057 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Fri, 4 Sep 1998 07:07:50 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from www.nobell.com (www.nobell.com [208.24.204.34]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id HAA26050 for ; Fri, 4 Sep 1998 07:07:49 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rkw@dataplex.net) Received: from odin (unverified [208.24.204.34]) by www.nobell.com (EMWAC SMTPRS 0.83) with SMTP id ; Sat, 05 Sep 1998 09:06:50 -0500 Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.19980905090649.00a372b0@mail.dataplex.net> X-Sender: rkw@mail.dataplex.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.5 (32) Date: Sat, 05 Sep 1998 09:06:49 -0500 To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" From: Richard Wackerbarth Subject: Re: HEADS UP: 3.0 enters BETA status in 12 days! Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <4615.904910337@time.cdrom.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 04:58 AM 9/4/98 -0700, you wrote: >> What does this mean? How/when will we branch out a RELENG_3_0_0 and >> take -current to be 3.1-current? > >Both premature questions. I don't think we know yet. I don't think that the question is premature. At some point (perhaps immediately), some committers will have to be able to "bite the bullet" and admit that their code will not be appropriate for inclusion in the 3.0.0 release. Are you suggesting that they "go away" until 3.0 gets released? I would suggest, however, that rather than putting this future stuff in the "head" branch that a side branch be set up and that branch merged into the head after the 3.0.0 release. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message