From owner-freebsd-security Thu Jul 27 11:37:18 1995 Return-Path: security-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.11/8.6.6) id LAA01965 for security-outgoing; Thu, 27 Jul 1995 11:37:18 -0700 Received: from puli.cisco.com (puli.cisco.com [171.69.1.174]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.11/8.6.6) with ESMTP id LAA01959 ; Thu, 27 Jul 1995 11:37:17 -0700 Received: from localhost.cisco.com (localhost.cisco.com [127.0.0.1]) by puli.cisco.com (8.6.8+c/8.6.5) with SMTP id LAA24171; Thu, 27 Jul 1995 11:35:20 -0700 Message-Id: <199507271835.LAA24171@puli.cisco.com> To: "Rodney W. Grimes" Cc: mark@grondar.za (Mark Murray), rgrimes@freebsd.org, security@freebsd.org, freebsd-foreign-secure@grondar.za Subject: Re: secure/ changes... In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 24 Jul 1995 10:23:26 PDT." <199507241723.KAA19257@gndrsh.aac.dev.com> Date: Thu, 27 Jul 1995 11:35:20 -0700 From: Paul Traina Sender: security-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk > As already pointed out no less than 2 times, DES is a munition, importing > munitions is just as regulated as exporting them. DISCLAIMER: I don't know what the hell I'm talking about. While I can see how you came upon this interpretation by following that anology, I am pretty certain that that is -not- the case with DES. I have never heard any of our trade people at cisco or NSA folks I've talked to who deal with this crap raise an issue with importation of DES. Paul