Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 17:09:09 -0300 (ADT) From: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org> To: Vulpes Velox <v.velox@vvelox.net> Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Unionfs and nullfs question Message-ID: <20041025170823.J872@ganymede.hub.org> In-Reply-To: <20041024104304.1620e1ab@vixen42.24-119-122-191.cpe.cableone.net> References: <20041022174052.4a203268@fennec> <20041023113958.X16873@ganymede.hub.org> <20041024104304.1620e1ab@vixen42.24-119-122-191.cpe.cableone.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 24 Oct 2004, Vulpes Velox wrote: > I eventually decided to go with doing a mount_nfs -o union for it :) > From one of the conversations I found previously, this is suppose to be > safer than doing doing a regular mount_unionfs. I use nfs to 'replace' nullfs for viewing the lower file system of unionfs's ... I find that, under load, I get *alot* of timeouts of the nfs mounts, with 4 nfsd's running ... something you might want to watch out for ... > ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041025170823.J872>