From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 17 18:07:54 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BD8F1065670; Mon, 17 Nov 2008 18:07:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dfr@rabson.org) Received: from itchy.rabson.org (unknown [IPv6:2002:50b1:e8f2:1::143]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5342B8FC08; Mon, 17 Nov 2008 18:07:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dfr@rabson.org) Received: from [IPv6:2001:470:909f:1:21b:63ff:feb8:5abc] (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:909f:1:21b:63ff:feb8:5abc]) by itchy.rabson.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFF0D3FB7; Mon, 17 Nov 2008 18:06:39 +0000 (GMT) Message-Id: <8A43CF07-D06F-4EAF-A171-DF7F10F036F5@rabson.org> From: Doug Rabson To: Pawel Jakub Dawidek In-Reply-To: <20081117180253.GA1733@garage.freebsd.pl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v929.2) Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 18:07:52 +0000 References: <20081117171017.GB1489@garage.freebsd.pl> <4AC8E131-CD12-4075-948F-DA187B4EE2AD@rabson.org> <20081117180253.GA1733@garage.freebsd.pl> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.929.2) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.92/8642/Mon Nov 17 04:01:08 2008 on itchy.rabson.org X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: NFS regression. X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 18:07:54 -0000 On 17 Nov 2008, at 18:02, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: > On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 05:54:02PM +0000, Doug Rabson wrote: >> >> On 17 Nov 2008, at 17:10, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: >> >>> Hi. >>> >>> I'm seeing this panic very often now with few days old HEAD: >>> >>> >>> Any ideas? >> >> Can you reproduce this with INVARIANTS turned on? That should trigger >> a KASSERT a bit earlier and give me a chance to fix the thing. > > I've INVARIANTS on... Is there some assertion added recently you are > expecting? Hmm. I added an assert in r184921 which ought to have caught this. Could you try this patch and see if it changes anything: Index: rpc/clnt_dg.c =================================================================== --- rpc/clnt_dg.c (revision 184968) +++ rpc/clnt_dg.c (working copy) @@ -543,7 +543,7 @@ if (tv > 0) { if (cu->cu_closing || cu->cu_closed) - error = 0; + error = ESHUTDOWN; else error = msleep(cr, &cs->cs_lock, cu->cu_waitflag, cu->cu_waitchan, tv);