Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 22:00:36 -0400 From: Sean Collins <sean@seanmcollins.com> To: current@freebsd.org Cc: Robert Watson <rwatson@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Three cheers for the status quo, enough now? (was: Re: tmux(1) in base) Message-ID: <9DE63F72-A43A-4704-85E6-A61F1C3CE70C@seanmcollins.com> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.0909240020340.95581@fledge.watson.org> References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.0909240020340.95581@fledge.watson.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I heartily agree with the sentiment that this discussion has yielded =20 no discernible value and has instead left some with bruised egos, and =20= I must say that the lack of _CODE_ is telling. Look, if you think Sendmail and BIND are indeed egregious and far too =20= bloated for your taste, please put your money where your mouth is and =20= release a patch implementing the desired functionality, or reduction =20 in functionality. I use Sendmail and BIND to put food on my table and =20= beer in my fridge, so naturally I'm going to be against any change in =20= the base. However, if I am given a nice and easy option at =20 installation, where BIND and Sendmail are installed as an extra, =20 similar to the WWW option in sysinstall, I'm not going to be opposed =20 to it. That's my two cents as FreeBSD user. Take it for what it's worth. Thank You, Sean Collins -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.12 (Darwin) iEYEARECAAYFAkq60sQACgkQ9g9WSXiROTHOewCfVGu2bIcpdKWmAYZdr9uhw28K P2AAn0IYk61xEmDjVFR8VFSFf+qd+O0c =3D9lU2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?9DE63F72-A43A-4704-85E6-A61F1C3CE70C>