Date: Tue, 6 Jan 1998 21:17:18 +0100 From: Andreas Klemm <andreas@klemm.gtn.com> To: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> Cc: jkh@time.cdrom.com, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: LINT is missing examples for sio1-3 ? GENERIC does so Message-ID: <19980106211718.17515@klemm.gtn.com> In-Reply-To: <199801060847.TAA05876@godzilla.zeta.org.au>; from Bruce Evans on Tue, Jan 06, 1998 at 07:47:35PM %2B1100 References: <199801060847.TAA05876@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Jan 06, 1998 at 07:47:35PM +1100, Bruce Evans wrote: > >> > OK, but the proposed change just copied lines from GENERIC to give > >> > uninteresting differences in the port, irq and disable flag. > >> > >> OK Andreas, make them more interesting! :-) > > > >Should I add a hat option ? Is that interesting enough ? ;-) > > > >I would suggest to comment that entries out just to let it be > >an example. Ok ? > > No. LINT already has too much documentation that belongs in man pages. > The sio man page actually already has examples for the 4 standard ports. ok, then perhaps we should forget about this. I only got the feeling, that LINT and GENERIC get "out of sync". I didn't see it the way you pointed out and didn't think of the examples in the manpages. Ok now for everybody to keep it as it is ? ;-) Andreas /// -- Andreas Klemm powered by ,,symmetric multiprocessor FreeBSD''
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19980106211718.17515>