From owner-freebsd-questions Thu May 16 4:29:30 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from dc.cis.okstate.edu (dc.cis.okstate.edu [139.78.100.219]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BE8837B40C for ; Thu, 16 May 2002 04:29:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dc.cis.okstate.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dc.cis.okstate.edu (8.11.6/8.11.3) with ESMTP id g4GBTIl12442 for ; Thu, 16 May 2002 06:29:19 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from martin@dc.cis.okstate.edu) Message-Id: <200205161129.g4GBTIl12442@dc.cis.okstate.edu> Reply-To: martin@dc.cis.okstate.edu To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: make world VS make build world Date: Thu, 16 May 2002 06:29:18 -0500 From: Martin McCormick Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG What would be the difference in what was done on a system if someone upgraded a source tree and then in /usr/src typed make world instead of make build world In this case, the make took 1 hour and appeared to not crash. This is on a FreeBSD 4.4 system moving to 4.5. Would a make build world be necessary or should some other steps be taken before continuing with the recommended procedures? Martin McCormick To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message