From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 30 04:54:36 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 859A21065674; Thu, 30 Oct 2008 04:54:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stupendoussteve@hotmail.com) Received: from bay0-omc2-s4.bay0.hotmail.com (bay0-omc2-s4.bay0.hotmail.com [65.54.246.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CD478FC1E; Thu, 30 Oct 2008 04:54:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stupendoussteve@hotmail.com) Received: from hotmail.com ([207.46.10.244]) by bay0-omc2-s4.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Wed, 29 Oct 2008 21:54:35 -0700 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Wed, 29 Oct 2008 21:54:35 -0700 Message-ID: Received: from 207.46.10.254 by by122fd.bay122.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Thu, 30 Oct 2008 04:54:34 GMT X-Originating-IP: [68.225.143.90] X-Originating-Email: [stupendoussteve@hotmail.com] X-Sender: stupendoussteve@hotmail.com From: "Steven Susbauer" To: cperciva@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 22:54:34 -0600 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed X-OriginalArrivalTime: 30 Oct 2008 04:54:35.0415 (UTC) FILETIME=[9AFF4A70:01C93A4B] Cc: fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freebsd-update "can't find update.FreeBSD.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 04:54:36 -0000 Colin Percival wrote: >RW wrote: >>With portsnap the default server is itself one of the servers on the >>SRV list, so portsnap should fall-back to a working server even when >>DNS is unavailable (behind a proxy) or screwed-up by a router etc. >> >>I dont see a reason why update.FreeBSD.org shouldn't have the >>same A-record as update1.FreeBSD.org, so that it "just works". > >With portsnap, I asked for the A record to be created not as a fallback >for people with broken DNS, but instead as a backwards compatibility >mechanism for people who were running old versions of portsnap which >didn't do SRV lookups. To be honest, I didn't realize that there were >so many people with broken DNS resolution. > >I'll ask the FreeBSD DNS admins to add an A record for update.freebsd.org. > >Colin Percival I had up until now been transparently benefiting from that "non-fallback" legacy A record for portsnap as well. Thanks for looking into this. I am personally amazed that an issue caused by a misconfiguration on my end could result in changes on the FreeBSD DNS servers to avoid similar issues for others. Kudos to FreeBSD support!