From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 16 07:34:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42E371065670; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 07:34:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@deman.com) Received: from cp11.openaccess.org (cp11.openaccess.org [66.114.41.130]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24F4A8FC1C; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 07:34:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mono-sis1.s.bli.openaccess.org ([66.114.32.149] helo=[192.168.2.248]) by cp11.openaccess.org with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PIFRn-00084n-1Q; Mon, 15 Nov 2010 22:55:19 -0800 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Michael DeMan In-Reply-To: <01NUB1F8POL000BNN4@tmk.com> Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 22:55:11 -0800 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <01NUB1F8POL000BNN4@tmk.com> To: Terry Kennedy X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - cp11.openaccess.org X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - deman.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ZFS panic after replacing log device X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 07:34:13 -0000 Hi Terry, I am no ZFS kernel-code dude or anything, but it is well known that = losing the ZIL can corrupt things pretty bad with ZFS. You may want to skim the archives at OpenSolaris ZFS discuss = All in all, if I was in your situation I would give a whirl at = installing OpenSolaris and going from there, being sure not to upgrade = the pool version past what is supported by FreeBSD and going from there. Unfortunately we all find ourselves in a bit of a pickle with ZFS right = now with the Oracle acquisition of Sun. For myself, I would stick with = deploying on FreeBSD but I think its going to be FBSD 9.1 before its = going to be truly ready for production. Just my 2-cents. - Mike On Nov 15, 2010, at 10:24 PM, Terry Kennedy wrote: >> I can give a developer remote console / root access to the box if = that would=20 >> help. I have a couple days before I will need to nuke the pool and = restore it=20 >> from backups.=20 >=20 > I haven't heard from anyone that wants to look into this. I need to = get the=20 > pool back into service soon. If I don't get any requests to postpone = or offers=20 > to investigate by 00:00 GMT on the 18th, I'll proceed with = re-initializing the=20 > pool (minus the SSD, which is persona non grata).=20 >=20 > Terry Kennedy http://www.tmk.com > terry@tmk.com New York, NY USA > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-fs@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-fs-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"