From owner-freebsd-arch Thu Aug 1 15:30: 3 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 289CB37B400; Thu, 1 Aug 2002 15:29:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from corbulon.video-collage.com (corbulon.video-collage.com [64.35.99.179]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A88643E6E; Thu, 1 Aug 2002 15:29:57 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from misha.murex.com (250-217.customer.cloud9.net [168.100.250.217]) by corbulon.video-collage.com (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g71MTrHV088994 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 1 Aug 2002 18:29:55 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com) X-Authentication-Warning: corbulon.video-collage.com: Host 250-217.customer.cloud9.net [168.100.250.217] claimed to be misha.murex.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-u" From: Mikhail Teterin Organization: Virtual Estates, Inc. To: Terry Lambert , "Jacques A. Vidrine" Subject: Re: OpenSSL vs. -lmd Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2002 18:30:20 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.4.2 Cc: Alexandr Kovalenko , arch@FreeBSD.ORG References: <200207311641.g6VGfRWj099655@freefall.freebsd.org> <20020801212917.GA27792@madman.nectar.cc> <3D49B2E9.A2D7C343@mindspring.com> In-Reply-To: <3D49B2E9.A2D7C343@mindspring.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: <200208011830.20096.mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.15 (www dot roaringpenguin dot com slash mimedefang) Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thursday 01 August 2002 06:15 pm, Terry Lambert wrote: = I would call the contortions that Mozilla goes through to get an = alternate OpenSSL "Heroic measures". Those measures are also the stupid ones. There is no need for them. = Asking every software vendor out there to perform the same contortions = so that their applications aren't FreeBSD-specific after they're = written is unacceptable. Nobody is planning to ask them. If your application only compiles with a particular version of OpenSSL means the app is broken. In any case, to bring this thread back to the SUBJECT, having -lmd does not help those poor vendors a bit. I'd suggest using -lmd _inside_ -lcrypto, if OpenSSL's implementations of the digests weren't faster... Since they are, -lmd should be dropped. Whatever your opinion on the rest of OpenSSL, its API(s) did not change in a while... Especially in the Message Digest area. -mi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message