Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 13:45:36 -0800 From: <soralx@cydem.org> To: <freebsd-chat@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Venting my frustration with FreeBSD Message-ID: <20061206134536.0c775367@freen0de> In-Reply-To: <200612061006.56852.jhb@freebsd.org> References: <200612041443.15154.josh@tcbug.org> <200612051736.47980.jhb@freebsd.org> <200612051707.46705.josh@tcbug.org> <200612061006.56852.jhb@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> 512-way machine? Scaling on a 512-way machine is quite a different > ball of wax from scaling on 4-way, and scaling up to 32 and 64 is > going to be another ball of wax as well. can you give a few examples how scaling ability can be a function of the number of cores? seems like my curiosity exceeds my imagination today -- can't come up with any good reasons why this is true :) > John Baldwin [SorAlx] ridin' VN1500-B2
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20061206134536.0c775367>