Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 14 Oct 2017 09:13:18 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 222997] security/py-fail2ban upgrade to 0.10.0 will break pf rules on system
Message-ID:  <bug-222997-13-a755DOP1wt@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-222997-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-222997-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D222997

--- Comment #1 from theis@gmx.at ---
I don't use pf so I can't confirm that what I write below does the fix:

When 0.10 came out there was a discussion on GitHub about fail2ban deleting=
 the
rules of pf. The problem is that the definition of the action has changed, I
added a warning about that to the installation message:

In jails, it is no longer sufficient to write
action =3D pf

You need to specify a  port (or port range) and name, e.g
action   =3D pf[port=3D{80 443}, name=3Dhttp]

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-222997-13-a755DOP1wt>