From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 6 11:15:49 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FE9F16A407 for ; Fri, 6 Oct 2006 11:15:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from josh@tcbug.org) Received: from alnrmhc14.comcast.net (alnrmhc14.comcast.net [206.18.177.54]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C85EA43D46 for ; Fri, 6 Oct 2006 11:15:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from josh@tcbug.org) Received: from gimpy (c-24-118-173-219.hsd1.mn.comcast.net[24.118.173.219]) by comcast.net (alnrmhc14) with ESMTP id <20061006111548b1400j7i60e>; Fri, 6 Oct 2006 11:15:48 +0000 From: Josh Paetzel To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2006 06:15:45 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.3 References: <471361580610051459m7f7c7d3dwa982dddcb139b684@mail.gmail.com> <19861fba0610051822ma6c8df0uf60b7e25ac839389@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <19861fba0610051822ma6c8df0uf60b7e25ac839389@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200610060615.45551.josh@tcbug.org> Cc: J65nko Subject: Re: FreeBSD and 2 ADSL links X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Oct 2006 11:15:49 -0000 On Thursday 05 October 2006 20:22, J65nko wrote: > On 10/5/06, Thiago Rocha wrote: > > hi! > > > > Brazilian I and do not say English, I forgive for any error! > > > > I have a FreeBSD Server (5.4). This server links ADSL has two, > > and I need to balance the load between them, e also case one > > stops the other keeps the connection. > > You can do this with pf, see > http://openbsd.org/faq/pf/pools.html#outgoing and > http://openbsd.org/faq/pf/carp.html Using pools is sort of a poor man's load balancing. It's more of a round-robin approach to using more than one link. It's not going to allow you to do a single transfer using the aggregated bandwidth of both links. -- Thanks, Josh Paetzel