From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 20 04:00:21 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC775106566B for ; Fri, 20 Mar 2009 04:00:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: from ey-out-2122.google.com (ey-out-2122.google.com [74.125.78.24]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A7858FC0C for ; Fri, 20 Mar 2009 04:00:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: by ey-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 4so115815eyf.7 for ; Thu, 19 Mar 2009 21:00:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=WHgY2GdloMXjZy+wpd6rla0+Pk/6wH4pSwTGeKsuoAk=; b=GM1V7H4uYVczmvCkRknUaoujQ4eYtQHhJ7TcGwyxHr4/tPN2rpighOVcWMnwVN08W5 j8JiUxb0Mp5nE4tadUxPjQ6RDX/kOf9LAvb7b2wPVNxd8YR77m5xSvAYa67JTCfTPZm2 ESVAHgqcawa72wZEKtsdzLEY2qaKDqo5VvfTg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=WGLLeI6XnUDK6ybDi4Vr5AfP0Fnl5O7gd/ospARW5R8nkvPFOqiqU2aOIo9JxJzAwb HneSRpq2kJHunjt9ui9/MsU+J6OqnF3L1J3/Y2yaRrItGe6VWyod6SQYcPxqA53bJ6W3 3m3prxKxk1BlyJdxbYogg8/DMETYJVdIOoIoc= Received: by 10.210.52.15 with SMTP id z15mr2442651ebz.87.1237521620104; Thu, 19 Mar 2009 21:00:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com (bb-87-81-140-128.ukonline.co.uk [87.81.140.128]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 28sm1844946eyg.15.2009.03.19.21.00.09 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 19 Mar 2009 21:00:19 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 03:59:53 +0000 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20090320035953.3fe8434e@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <49C297B7.6090805@datapipe.com> References: <8250ac3f0903191139m7c895ff9gde584ad16e3923f0@mail.gmail.com> <49C297B7.6090805@datapipe.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.1 (GTK+ 2.14.7; i386-portbld-freebsd7.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Portsnap vs CSup X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 04:00:21 -0000 On Thu, 19 Mar 2009 14:06:31 -0500 Paul Procacci wrote: > Freedom of choice. That choice is up to you. Whichever you you feel > most comfortable with...that's the one you should use. Personally, I > use both. Just don't swap back and forth on the same ports tree. If you switch from csup to portsnap, you should do a "portsnap extract", going from portsnap to csup you should ideally delete the tree.