From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 13 21:10:36 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCD6516A402 for ; Sun, 13 May 2007 21:10:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [207.200.4.66]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4F0013C465 for ; Sun, 13 May 2007 21:10:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id 377BB4F1; Sun, 13 May 2007 16:10:36 -0500 (CDT) Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 16:10:36 -0500 To: Steve Kargl Message-ID: <20070513211036.GA18134@soaustin.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i From: linimon@lonesome.com (Mark Linimon) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 13 May 2007 21:27:45 +0000 Cc: Mark Linimon , freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Process for requesting reverting patch? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 21:10:36 -0000 On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 11:09:12AM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote: > Rendering the debugger useless with the default shell > would seem to be a critical bug to me, but somehow/one > decided that the severity was non-critical. We really need to redefine what 'critical' is, since that field is so often overused as to be meaningless. That may be on of the topics I try to address at BSDCan when talking about PR workflow. mcl