Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2000 01:15:07 +0100 From: Ben Smithurst <ben@scientia.demon.co.uk> To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no> Cc: arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: fetch(1) Message-ID: <20000430011507.A22035@strontium.scientia.demon.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <xzp4s8lqde8.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> References: <xzp4s8lqde8.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > I've had a fetch(3)-based version of fetch(1) in my tree for nearly a > year... It implements all options except: > > -A (libfetch currently does not follow redirects, this may change > when I rewrite the http code) > > -b (libfetch does not use code that triggers the bug in question) > > -r (libfetch doesn't know about offsets, but I plan to change that > soon) I for one would rather at least -r were implemented before replacing the current fetch(1). Is your fetch(3)-based version available for download anywhere? Other than that I don't really see any problems. -- Ben Smithurst / ben@scientia.demon.co.uk / PGP: 0x99392F7D To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000430011507.A22035>