From owner-freebsd-arch Fri May 12 1:25:26 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE0CA37BD10 for ; Fri, 12 May 2000 01:25:20 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from des@flood.ping.uio.no) Received: (from des@localhost) by flood.ping.uio.no (8.9.3/8.9.3) id KAA32211; Fri, 12 May 2000 10:25:10 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from des@flood.ping.uio.no) To: Sheldon Hearn Cc: arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: fetch(1) References: <51524.958062160@axl.ops.uunet.co.za> From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: 12 May 2000 10:25:09 +0200 In-Reply-To: Sheldon Hearn's message of "Thu, 11 May 2000 18:22:40 +0200" Message-ID: Lines: 12 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0802 (Gnus v5.8.2) Emacs/20.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Sheldon Hearn writes: > On 11 May 2000 18:07:43 +0200, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > > I'm still waiting for comments about my libfetch-based fetch(1). Get > > the latest tarball from . > Last I saw, it was still not yet a drop-in replacement for the existing > fetch(1). From your wording, I take it this has changed? Yes. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@flood.ping.uio.no To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message