From owner-freebsd-atm Thu Feb 24 19:50:45 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-atm@freebsd.org Received: from tama5.ecl.ntt.co.jp (tama5.ecl.ntt.co.jp [129.60.39.102]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC55837BD51 for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2000 19:50:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from abe.hirofumi@lab.ntt.co.jp) Received: from nttmail3.ecl.ntt.co.jp (nttmail3.ecl.ntt.co.jp [129.60.39.100]) by tama5.ecl.ntt.co.jp (8.9.3+3.2W/3.7W/01/21/00) with ESMTP id MAA23462; Fri, 25 Feb 2000 12:50:41 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from abe.hirofumi@lab.ntt.co.jp) Received: from imi.m.ecl.ntt.co.jp by nttmail3.ecl.ntt.co.jp (8.9.3+3.2W/3.7W/01/18/00) with ESMTP id MAA08666; Fri, 25 Feb 2000 12:50:40 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from abe.hirofumi@lab.ntt.co.jp) Received: from CF-S21 (meseipc-abepad.pflab.ecl.ntt.co.jp [129.60.17.139]) by imi.m.ecl.ntt.co.jp (8.9.3/3.7W) with ESMTP id MAA26805; Fri, 25 Feb 2000 12:50:41 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <4.2.0.58.J.20000225124047.031acb10@imi.m.ecl.ntt.co.jp> X-Sender: ha006@imi.m.ecl.ntt.co.jp X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.0.58.J Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2000 12:56:46 +0900 To: Kenjiro Cho , freebsd-atm@freebsd.org From: Hirofumi ABE Subject: Re: Traffic shaping on HARP Cc: abe.hirofumi@lab.ntt.co.jp In-Reply-To: <20000224205153B.kjc@csl.sony.co.jp> References: <4.2.0.58.J.20000224172427.00a2d400@imi.m.ecl.ntt.co.jp> <4.2.0.58.J.20000223194418.00a552d0@imi.m.ecl.ntt.co.jp> <20000223222947T.kjc@csl.sony.co.jp> <4.2.0.58.J.20000224172427.00a2d400@imi.m.ecl.ntt.co.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: owner-freebsd-atm@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org At 20:51 00/02/24 +0900, Kenjiro Cho wrote: >Hirofumi ABE wrote: > > I confirmed BSD box using en drivers can be connected through cisco4000. > > This works very well when we use ping, telnet and http, but only ftp-data > > doesn't. > > The cisco seems to discard the data. > > Why only ftp-data cause? > >Path MTU discovery? Thanks, I avoided the problem. I can't decide which box is wrong BSD or cisco, but the MTU size of 9180 seems to have some problems. Current configuration is following.. [Sender BSD] ifconfig en0 inet 192.168.10.20 netmask 255.255.255.0 mtu 1500 up route add -iface cisco64 -link en0:3.0.0.40 pvctxctl en0 64 -p 6975 route add -net 192.168.65.0 -gateway cisco64 [Cisco] enable conf t interface atm 0.5 point-to-point ip address 192.168.10.1 255.255.255.0 atm pvc 64 0 64 aal5snap 3000 3000 3000 inarp exit interface atm 0.6 point-to-point ip address 192.168.65.1 255.255.255.0 atm pvc 64 0 64 aal5snap 3000 3000 3000 inarp exit disable [Receiver BSD] ifconfig en0 inet 192.168.65.72 netmask 255.255.255.0 mtu 1500 up route add -iface cisco65 -link en0:3.0.0.41 pvctxctl en0 65 -p 6975 route add -net 192.168.10.0 -gateway cisco65 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-atm" in the body of the message