From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 14 20:54:36 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B77816A402 for ; Wed, 14 Feb 2007 20:54:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dghatikachalam@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com (nz-out-0506.google.com [64.233.162.237]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0186013C4B2 for ; Wed, 14 Feb 2007 20:54:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dghatikachalam@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i11so344105nzh for ; Wed, 14 Feb 2007 12:54:32 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=Vfs9ninVPoQN3KYZtrtqI3A/kg9azRhsnbaL/ZD4kj8dTZJHoTBeMKVj3TVn9UCHTZcFmsZCPRQrKVMSRlwDsM8oIywcKvC/58Y6tZghf6AJVIb7I3qgcDc9DThIRkFfSlz438gnsYRrRh5yxOenwC6xbI9RG/WA6eVcoNMNFEk= Received: by 10.114.73.1 with SMTP id v1mr730516waa.1171486471836; Wed, 14 Feb 2007 12:54:31 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.114.211.20 with HTTP; Wed, 14 Feb 2007 12:54:31 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 15:54:31 -0500 From: "Dak Ghatikachalam" To: "FreeBSD - Questions" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: RAID 10-LUN Question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 20:54:36 -0000 Hi Freebsd We have DELL/EMC CX-300 storage array hardware , Navisphere. , which consist of 15 Disks 320GB, I am planning to use this for Oracle( Linux) + SQL server(M$) purpose. We need to get that redundancy using RAID 10 and striple for the best performance. My thoughts are take most even number of possible disks( leaving private system partition area) and create the raid groups and kick a separate LUNS for MSSQL purpose. With this hardware config, Do you have any suggestion on getting the best performance and redundancy in place Thanks Dak