From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Feb 1 11:38:57 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99DEDCCAE3A for ; Wed, 1 Feb 2017 11:38:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from slw@zxy.spb.ru) Received: from zxy.spb.ru (zxy.spb.ru [195.70.199.98]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F471179F; Wed, 1 Feb 2017 11:38:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from slw@zxy.spb.ru) Received: from slw by zxy.spb.ru with local (Exim 4.86 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1cYtFU-0002D5-TO; Wed, 01 Feb 2017 14:38:52 +0300 Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2017 14:38:52 +0300 From: Slawa Olhovchenkov To: Jordan Caraballo Cc: Olivier =?utf-8?Q?Cochard-Labb=C3=A9?= , "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Disappointing packets-per-second performance results on a Dell, PE R530 Message-ID: <20170201113852.GB79121@zxy.spb.ru> References: <8f637e2e-cd59-dc65-8476-30989bea516b@gmail.com> <20170103174627.GW37118@zxy.spb.ru> <0cdc69d4-e23f-4beb-c4af-59259529287f@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <0cdc69d4-e23f-4beb-c4af-59259529287f@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: slw@zxy.spb.ru X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on zxy.spb.ru); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2017 11:38:57 -0000 On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 08:00:03PM -0400, Jordan Caraballo wrote: > Hi Oliver, my bad, I missed that one. Here is the info: > > * Switch with 48x 10G ports and 12x 40G ports was used > * (48) 10G connected nodes were used. > * (24) nodes on each side of the firewall > * Packet per second (PPS) tests were run using 'iperf' > * Bandwidth tests were run using 'nuttcp' > * Parallelization was handled by using pdsh > * Each of the 24 sending nodes ran either: > iperf3 -c "" -u -A 5 -l 512 -b 0 -t "" -J > nuttcp -fparse -l 128k -w1m -T "" "" Very strange result. I am don't see in you output any chelsio irq, like this: irq289: t5nex0:evt 2 0 irq300: t5nex0:1a0 204093767467 48085 irq301: t5nex0:1a1 204536605147 48189 irq302: t5nex0:1a2 204677310714 48222 irq303: t5nex0:1a3 204727624595 48234 irq304: t5nex0:1a4 204345362150 48144 irq305: t5nex0:1a5 203085398725 47847 irq306: t5nex0:1a6 204014240537 48066 irq307: t5nex0:1a7 204216351652 48114 irq308: t5nex0:1A0 132806676 31 irq309: t5nex0:1A1 133275327 31 Do you using polling? > On 31/01/17 16:45, Olivier Cochard-Labbé wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 6:53 PM, Jordan Caraballo > > > wrote: > > > > This are the most recent stats. No advances so far. The system has > > -Current right now. > > > > Any help or feedback would be appreciated. > > > > > > ​I've tried: But you didn't answer my previous question. > > > > How do you generate your IP traffic ? > > What tool are you using​ and can you provide the exact command line used ? > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"