From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 7 15:07:00 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7546F73E for ; Mon, 7 Oct 2013 15:07:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (troutmask.apl.washington.edu [128.95.76.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B4D729CC for ; Mon, 7 Oct 2013 15:07:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (localhost.apl.washington.edu [127.0.0.1]) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id r97F6wep082545; Mon, 7 Oct 2013 08:06:58 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: (from sgk@localhost) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id r97F6ws3082542; Mon, 7 Oct 2013 08:06:58 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sgk) Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2013 08:06:58 -0700 From: Steve Kargl To: Eitan Adler Subject: Re: [Heads Up] RCS removed from base Message-ID: <20131007150658.GA79233@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: freebsd-current Current X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2013 15:07:00 -0000 On Sun, Oct 06, 2013 at 10:43:21PM -0400, Eitan Adler wrote: > Hey all, > > RCS was removed from the base system in r256095. If you still want to > use RCS please install either devel/rcs or devel/rcs57. If not, be > sure to check out the alternatives (pun stolen and intended). > Perhaps, a note in src/UPDATING is appropriate? -- Steve