From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Sep 24 05:52:22 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 768CB16A407
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Sun, 24 Sep 2006 05:52:22 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from corwin@aeternal.net)
Received: from amber.aeternal.net (amber.aeternal.net [212.232.17.148])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 009DC43D46
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Sun, 24 Sep 2006 05:52:21 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from corwin@aeternal.net)
Received: from localhost (localhost.aeternal.net [127.0.0.1])
	by amber.aeternal.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19289B9CE;
	Sun, 24 Sep 2006 07:52:21 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at aeternal.net
Received: from amber.aeternal.net ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (amber.aeternal.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id tuQju2-B1yfd; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 07:52:20 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (chello089173027168.chello.sk [89.173.27.168])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by amber.aeternal.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26254B984;
	Sun, 24 Sep 2006 07:52:20 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <45161D12.2070900@aeternal.net>
Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 07:52:18 +0200
From: Martin Hudec <corwin@aeternal.net>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Charles Trevor <ct.lists@qgsltd.co.uk>
References: <8A9C90B0-E258-4ECE-9B0D-67F5020E104A@tca-cable-connector.com>	<20060922155323.710aeb62@localhost>
	<4513868C.3070403@qgsltd.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <4513868C.3070403@qgsltd.co.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Zabbix Port
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: corwin@aeternal.net
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 05:52:22 -0000

Hello Charles,


Charles Trevor wrote:
>   If done this way portupgrade et al shouldnt revert to building the 
> full package, which they seem to if you use a make flag to build the 
> client portion only.

As to avoid this issue of portupgrade not knowing the make flags used 
during first install, there is /usr/local/etc/pkgtools.conf file with 
its MAKE_ARGS section, where you can define this and portupgrade will 
know the make flags to be used during upgrade process.


Martin