From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 12:34:23 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0921337B401 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2003 12:34:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.speakeasy.net (mail15.speakeasy.net [216.254.0.215]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE38643F75 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2003 12:34:21 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jhb@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 31110 invoked from network); 30 Jul 2003 19:34:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO server.baldwin.cx) ([216.27.160.63]) (envelope-sender )encrypted SMTP for ; 30 Jul 2003 19:34:21 -0000 Received: from laptop.baldwin.cx (gw1.twc.weather.com [216.133.140.1]) by server.baldwin.cx (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h6UJYIGI068444; Wed, 30 Jul 2003 15:34:19 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jhb@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.5.4 on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <3F2637C0.78116E6E@mindspring.com> Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 15:34:39 -0400 (EDT) From: John Baldwin To: Terry Lambert cc: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PIII SMP X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 19:34:23 -0000 On 29-Jul-2003 Terry Lambert wrote: > freebsd_deamon@gmx.net wrote: >> >> dear list, >> >> buying two PIII for a dual system ... what do i have to pay attention to >> (besides the requirements of the M/B)? >> aka ... are all PIII SMP capable? > > You want the stepping to be the same. > > You may not be happy with P III's. I'm not sure if the SMP code > has been changed to handle only the xAPIC now, or not; there was > a discussion a little while back about supporting more than 16 > CPUs in a machine, which would require this change. Adding support for xAPICs isn't going to break P3 machines. Less FUD please. One of my test machines is a dual ppro 200 and although I haven't booted it in a while it ran current just fine the last time I tried. -- John Baldwin <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve!" - http://www.FreeBSD.org/