Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      02 Nov 2000 10:28:13 +0100
From:      Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org>
To:        "Daniel C. Sobral" <dcs@newsguy.com>
Cc:        Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/sys/kern kern_jail.c sysv_msg.c sysv_sem.csysv_shm.c  src/sys/sys jail.h
Message-ID:  <xzp4s1qradu.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
In-Reply-To: "Daniel C. Sobral"'s message of "Thu, 02 Nov 2000 10:26:32 %2B0900"
References:  <200010310134.RAA51258@freefall.freebsd.org> <200010311742.MAA85025@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> <39FF9B77.53831AF8@newsguy.com> <200011011826.NAA97040@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> <3A00C2C8.AE6BC84B@newsguy.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Daniel C. Sobral" <dcs@newsguy.com> writes:
> Garrett Wollman wrote:
> > <<On Wed, 01 Nov 2000 13:26:31 +0900, "Daniel C. Sobral" <dcs@newsguy.com> said:
> > > What about shared memory?
> > Already have that.  See shm_open(3).
> You said that using POSIX semaphores and message queues would
> automatically solve the problem with jail and SysV IPC. But shared
> memory is one of the components of SysV IPC, and suffers from the same
> problem with jail as the other two, but you didn't mention anything
> about POSIX shared memory. So... what about shared memory?

Already have that.  See shm_open(3).

DES
-- 
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzp4s1qradu.fsf>