Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 02:12:45 +0900 From: TAKATSU Tomonari <tota@rtfm.jp> To: pav@FreeBSD.org Cc: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/118775: [MAINTAINER] www/tdiary-devel: tDiary 2.1.4 contains a vulnerability Message-ID: <20071219021245.099e0c9c.tota@rtfm.jp> In-Reply-To: <200712181606.lBIG6JNJ070917@freefall.freebsd.org> References: <200712181606.lBIG6JNJ070917@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Shouldn't we remove tdiary-devel port, once tdiary port is updated to 2.2.0? No, we shouldn't. tDiary-devel is going to be prepared 2.3.x. (http://www.tdiary.org/20021112.html written in Japanese) regards, On Tue, 18 Dec 2007 16:06:19 GMT pav@FreeBSD.org wrote: > Synopsis: [MAINTAINER] www/tdiary-devel: tDiary 2.1.4 contains a vulnerability > > State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback > State-Changed-By: pav > State-Changed-When: Tue Dec 18 16:04:42 UTC 2007 > State-Changed-Why: > Committed, thanks. > > Shouldn't we remove tdiary-devel port, once tdiary port is updated to 2.2.0? > > > Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-ports-bugs->pav > Responsible-Changed-By: pav > Responsible-Changed-When: Tue Dec 18 16:04:42 UTC 2007 > Responsible-Changed-Why: > Track > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=118775 -- TAKATSU Tomonari <tota@rtfm.jp>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20071219021245.099e0c9c.tota>