From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sun Nov  5 18:21:57 1995
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id SAA27478
          for hackers-outgoing; Sun, 5 Nov 1995 18:21:57 -0800
Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [192.216.222.226])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id SAA27472
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Sun, 5 Nov 1995 18:21:53 -0800
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.6.12/8.6.9) with SMTP id SAA21859; Sun, 5 Nov 1995 18:21:00 -0800
To: rkw@dataplex.net (Richard Wackerbarth)
cc: davidg@Root.COM, hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: More nits 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 05 Nov 1995 19:53:59 CST."
             <v02130514acc319947fbf@[199.183.109.242]> 
Date: Sun, 05 Nov 1995 18:21:00 -0800
Message-ID: <21857.815624460@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

> IMHO, the "risk" of adding this to 2.1 is much lower than the risk of
> Jordan's "addressing" the inability to sysconfig /var. (Neither of which
> would worry me)

Huh?  Did I miss something?  What's this about `sysconfig /var'?  I
don't even know what Richard is *talking about* here?

I don't know about double standards, but this is certainly a case of
double confusion! :-)

					Jordan