Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2000 08:44:01 -0400 From: James Housley <jim@thehousleys.net> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: erlang port -- a poster child (Re: I'll be rolling a 4.1.1 r Message-ID: <39CA0291.C291F9D1@thehousleys.net> References: <200009211227.IAA42894@misha.privatelabs.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
mi@aldan.algebra.com wrote:
>
> Please, consider new PR-class(es) (port-update, port-maintainer) for
> this -- that's much more formal, easier to search for and more obvious
> for a person filling it the PR out. One person so far agreed and no one
> objected...
>
Here is my message of support. Let me see if I have this straight.
"port-update" is for changes/fixes/etc from everyone but the maintainer.
"port-maintainer" is for changes/fixes/etc from the maintainer.
Which is used for a new port?
Jim
--
If it happens once, it's a bug.
If it happens twice, it's a feature.
If it happens more than twice, it's windows.
-- Luiz de Barros
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?39CA0291.C291F9D1>