Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 12 Apr 2007 19:55:26 +0200
From:      Bernd Walter <ticso@cicely12.cicely.de>
To:        Lev Serebryakov <lev@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        Bernd Walter <ticso@cicely.de>, current@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: Re[2]: ZFS to support chflags?
Message-ID:  <20070412175525.GB30772@cicely12.cicely.de>
In-Reply-To: <168809424.20070412205725@serebryakov.spb.ru>
References:  <200704112004.03903.lists@jnielsen.net> <20070412021645.GQ30772@cicely12.cicely.de> <168809424.20070412205725@serebryakov.spb.ru>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 08:57:25PM +0400, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> Hello Bernd,
> 
> Thursday, April 12, 2007, 6:16:46 AM, you wrote:
> 
> BW> Some binaries have such flags set, but it is not required, otherwise
> BW> diskless NFS wouldn't work.
> BW> I often see installworld warnings about beeing unable to set extended
> BW> flags on ld.so and others on my diskless boxes.
>   nodump flag is very useful. For example, home partition on one of my servers contains about 20Gb of nodump-content, it saves me pretty much backup space and time...

Yes, but dump doesn't support ZFS and with ZFS you can much simpler
split out non backup directories in different filesystems.

-- 
B.Walter                http://www.bwct.de      http://www.fizon.de
bernd@bwct.de           info@bwct.de            support@fizon.de



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070412175525.GB30772>