From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 27 07:08:05 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A00616A4CF for ; Thu, 27 May 2004 07:08:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.shock.ro (mail.shock.ro [212.93.151.164]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 625DF43D48 for ; Thu, 27 May 2004 07:08:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from aanton@reversedhell.net) Received: from localhost (localhost.ro [127.0.0.1]) by mail.shock.ro (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B3B382; Thu, 27 May 2004 17:05:45 +0300 (EEST) Received: from mail.shock.ro ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.shock.ro [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 65218-03; Thu, 27 May 2004 17:05:44 +0300 (EEST) Received: from [10.0.0.2] (unknown [82.77.151.42]) by mail.shock.ro (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A9787E; Thu, 27 May 2004 17:05:44 +0300 (EEST) Message-ID: <40B5F61F.2030407@reversedhell.net> Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 17:07:27 +0300 From: Anton Alin-Adrian User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.6 (X11/20040516) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Steven Hartland , freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org References: <40B5E73E.9000708@reversedhell.net><0a2e01c443ec$1466c9c0$7b07000a@int.mediasurface.com> <40B5EB68.5000308@reversedhell.net> <0a6701c443ef$cfe89ef0$7b07000a@int.mediasurface.com> In-Reply-To: <0a6701c443ef$cfe89ef0$7b07000a@int.mediasurface.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.84.0.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at shock.ro Subject: Re: how many IP aliases X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 14:08:05 -0000 Steven Hartland wrote: > Ah I assumed u meant irc vhost "servers" > Still leaves there question why would each psync require a specific IP? > If the IRC network you connection to limits on connections per IP > e.g. QuakeNet ( which all should do ). You just need to apply > for a trust for "X" connections and your all sorted. Using multiple > IP's for such a use would be totally wasteful. > Our ISP's policy is that when one IP gets flooded, it gets blocked from internet access for a while. That's the reason for so many IPs. Not perfect, but helps a lot. > Steve > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Anton Alin-Adrian" > >>Different ports? Why would be using different ports different? They (users) >>need to go out to irc with a different IP each time they connect. In order >>to do that, psybnc needs to use that specific IP when connecting outside to >>the IRC server. I don't see how different ports will change this situation. >> >>Nambased vhosts work for web, I guess, but not for IRC. >> >>Let one correct me if I am wrong. > > > > ================================================ > This e.mail is private and confidential between Multiplay (UK) Ltd. and the person or entity to whom it is addressed. In the event of misdirection, the recipient is prohibited from using, copying, printing or otherwise disseminating it or any information contained in it. > > In the event of misdirection, illegible or incomplete transmission please telephone (023) 8024 3137 > or return the E.mail to postmaster@multiplay.co.uk. > > > Regards, -- Alin-Adrian Anton Reversed Hell Networks GPG keyID 0x1E2FFF2E (2963 0C11 1AF1 96F6 0030 6EE9 D323 639D 1E2F FF2E) gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 1E2FFF2E