From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 11 15:59:48 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68ED41065676 for ; Fri, 11 Dec 2009 15:59:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 289F48FC20 for ; Fri, 11 Dec 2009 15:59:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id nBBFtbwU006573; Fri, 11 Dec 2009 10:55:37 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id nBBFtbaS006572; Fri, 11 Dec 2009 10:55:37 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 10:55:37 -0500 From: Jerry McAllister To: Polytropon Message-ID: <20091211155537.GC6418@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <20091210145056.GA826@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <20091211045237.b1c089e6.freebsd@edvax.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20091211045237.b1c089e6.freebsd@edvax.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: Jerry McAllister , Doug Sampson , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HP USB 2.0 Tape Drive X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 15:59:48 -0000 On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 04:52:37AM +0100, Polytropon wrote: > On Thu, 10 Dec 2009 09:50:56 -0500, Jerry McAllister wrote: > > I don't think you will have a problem using a USB2 interface. > > But, I really cannot recommend DAT. That type of system seems > > to have been pushed beyond its ability. The tapes fail > > frequently. > > What about Ultrium tape? Is it better? Yes. I like the LTO tape system. It writes and reads fast. It seems reliable, though I haven't used it as heavily. It is missing a fast file search ability, so although it reads fast, it takes a while to find files. It is also expensive - like DLT - but if cheap fails, then that is really the most expensive. It is cheaper to get something that is reliable even if it has a higher price. ////jerry > > > But, if you can't read what you thought you wrote, it > > doesn't matter how fast you can search for it. > > A backup not readable is NOT a backup. And because it > isn't, your hard disks will fail. :-) > > -- > Polytropon > Magdeburg, Germany > Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 > Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...