From owner-freebsd-arch Thu May 30 16: 0: 7 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from fepC.post.tele.dk (fepC.post.tele.dk [195.41.46.147]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0BDE37B400 for ; Thu, 30 May 2002 16:00:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rafter ([80.63.125.30]) by fepC.post.tele.dk (InterMail vM.4.01.03.23 201-229-121-123-20010418) with SMTP id <20020530230002.ZYP27513.fepC.post.tele.dk@rafter>; Fri, 31 May 2002 01:00:02 +0200 Message-ID: <00c601c2082d$bc531ff0$6800a8c0@rafter> From: "Daniel Blankensteiner" To: "Gary Thorpe" Cc: References: Subject: Re: FreeBSD daemon configurations redesign Date: Fri, 31 May 2002 01:00:03 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG ----- Original Message ----- From: "Gary Thorpe" > I do agree that making an /etc/daemon directory to store daemon > configuration files is probably a good thing to do. A SysV-style init would > help with this though. Also, I am sure people will want to distinguish > between 'core' daemons and user-added ones external to the base. I don't know anything about the SysV-style, but yes the core/base daemons and the user/port daemons should be kept apart! br db To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message