From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 3 02:16:56 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9007816A4CE for ; Wed, 3 Nov 2004 02:16:56 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [207.200.4.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 752DF43D2D for ; Wed, 3 Nov 2004 02:16:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from [192.160.235.2] (cs242746-26.austin.rr.com [24.27.46.26]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA977148DB; Tue, 2 Nov 2004 20:16:55 -0600 (CST) From: Mark Linimon Organization: Lonesome Dove Computing Services To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2004 21:14:20 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.7 References: <20041102222000.GA65845@xor.obsecurity.org> <200411021736.21034.kirk@strauser.com> In-Reply-To: <200411021736.21034.kirk@strauser.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200411022014.20689.linimon@lonesome.com> X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 03 Nov 2004 13:12:12 +0000 cc: Kirk Strauser Subject: Re: HEADS UP: Ports are not ready for CFLAGS=-O2 in 6.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2004 02:16:56 -0000 On Tuesday 02 November 2004 05:36 pm, Kirk Strauser wrote: > Out of curiosity, are those ports like to have equivalents in > Gentoo's "portage" system? I just checked and portage has ~8k entries and we have ~12k, so our problem is a little bit higher scale. AFAICT they also adopt changes more slowly than we do? mcl